The Daily Reckoning Tuesday, February 9, 2010 |
- Dow goes sub-10,000...but on the way to where?
- Sovereign debt crises threaten to dwarf Greenspan's bubbles,
- Plus, Bill Bonner discusses the economic battle on all fronts and zombies at the Treasury...
--- Secret Meeting in NYC Could... ---
Double Your Money in the Next 48 Hours
Just days ago, three of the world's largest oil producers all signed confidentiality pacts with this tiny oil company. Why? They've quietly entered formal talk to take over the company. Such an announcement would likely double the penny shares overnight - and it could come as soon as within the next 5 days. (The three majors are still in New York conducting due diligence and reviewing the books.)
So what happens if no formal offer materializes? Investors could get much, much richer. For details on this "win-win" situation, please go here now for the full report.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Fry, reporting from Laguna Beach, California...
A moment of silence, please, for our fallen comrade, the Dow Jones Industrial Average...
Yes, it's true; the beleaguered index fell through 10,000 yesterday to finish the trading session below where it stood last November. But yesterday was not the first time the Dow ever fell below 10,000. In fact, it was the 28th time since March 29, 1999 - the Dow's very first close above 10,000.
When the Dow scaled 10,000 in March of 1999, the stock market had been rallying for several years already. Just five years earlier, the Dow had breezed through the 5,000-level. Therefore, almost no one doubted that 10,000 would be a mere stepping stone to 15,000...or 20,000...or yes, even 36,000, as James Glassman and Kevin Hassett infamously predicted in their 1999 classic: Dow 36,000: The New Strategy for Profiting From the Coming Rise in the Stock Market.
But Dow 36,000 would have to wait awhile. Instead of continuing its vertical ascent, the Dow would spend the next eleven years tripping over itself. On twenty-eight separate occasions, the Dow would climb through 10,000...only to slip back below 10,000 sometime later. Each failed attempt produced more discouragement and fatalism than the time before. Stocks are supposed to appreciate over time, we are told - not to muddle along for years at a time. The Dow was supposed to blast through 10,000 in 1999 and never look back. It was not supposed to return to 10,000 as frequently as a "B-actor" to rehab.
What went wrong?
The short answer is: Alan Greenspan. (The long answer is also Alan Greenspan). The former Chairman of the Federal Reserve nurtured an epic financial bubble during most of his 19-year reign.
After slashing interest rates sharply during the early 1990s, Greenspan hiked them a bit in 1994, before cutting rates again between 1995 and 1998. The stock market tripled between 1990 and 1998. But here's the interesting thing: when Greenspan hiked rates in 1994, the stock market struggled...and so did Greenspan's popularity.
Greenspan did not regain his adoring followers until the back half of the 1990s, when he resumed cutting interest rates and stocks resumed their climb. But then he hiked rates slightly once again, as the stock market bubble reached its zenith in 1999. The bubble burst...and so did the aura of infallibility that had calcified around Greenspan's reputation. Suddenly, he had critics again...and he did not seem to like it very much.
He had learned his lesson: He would never be unpopular again...no matter how many bubbles he would have to inflate or reflate. As the stock market bubble began bursting in 2000, Greenspan quickly sprung into action - replacing the stock market bubble with an even more magnificent housing bubble. Between mid-2000 and mid-2003, Greenspan slashed short-term interest rates from 6.5% to 1.0%. He implemented "emergency interest rates without an emergency," as Jim Grant observed at the time.
The rest is history. The stock market rebounded, home prices rocketed and Wall Street bankers figured out how to convert junk mortgages into AAA securities. Greenspan is not to blame for everything, of course, just...almost everything.
What does this condensed and biased portrayal of history have to do with Dow 10,000? Just this: without easy credit, and the mania it spawned, Dow 10,000 would not have been possible. When the Dow first reached that magical level in 1999, the blue chip index was trading hands for about 28 times earnings - its highest valuation in 70 years.
Stocks were grossly overpriced. No doubt about it. Thus, to be an eager buyer of stocks in March 2000 was to believe that price mattered less than Alan Greenspan's magic touch. Eleven years later, we have discovered that price matters more.
But don't be discouraged. The Dow's disastrous decade does not invalidate the theory that stocks are an excellent long-term investment. Instead, the Dow's lost decade merely adds two corollaries to the theory: 1) Beware popular Fed Chairmen; 2) Price matters.
--- Gold: Time to buy the Dips ---
From Hulbert's No 1-Ranked Advisory Letter Over 5 Years, Our Most Shocking Forecast Yet...
Gold $2,000
"I'm so sure gold will soar higher I'll even make you a guarantee... plus, I'll give you five entirely new ways to play the trend..."
"Including one hidden way to snap up gold... for less than one penny per ounce..."
How can that be possible? Give me the next four minutes and I'll show you how...
---------------------------------------------------------------
| The Daily Reckoning PRESENTS: The plot thickens by the day...the global players are all lined up...the talking heads say we're in the clear...but have these recoveristas made a crucial error? It wouldn't be the first time. Dan Denning lays down some hard facts in today's guest essay...
The "Second Round of Pain" By Dan Denning Melbourne, Australia
If you've been thinking about reducing exposure to stocks, now might be a good time. And if you've been thinking about increasing your exposure to precious metals, now might be a good time.
According to Morgan Stanley economist Gerard Minack, the stock market is in for a correction after its 9-month "relief rally." In a note to clients Minack wrote, "We see the rise from March 2009 as a typical relief rally that follows major bear markets. Those relief rallies can occur regardless of underlying macro conditions, regardless of liquidity conditions and - most importantly - regardless of what happens next... We think risk assets have swung to pricing a better outlook than is likely."
Minack says that a 25% correction is now in order. To be fair though, he doesn't think the market will make new lows after that, only that it's gotten way ahead of itself at these levels. The Grand Old Man of Dow Theory, Richard Russell, is even more direct. He's predicting a "second round of pain" for stock markets. "I note that most analysts are now bullish," he observes, "and that they are recommending stocks for the 'continuing advance.' At the same time, most economists are optimistic, arguing that the 'longest recession since World War II has ended.'
"Typical," Russell gripes, "last March everyone was bearish and the market was establishing a temporary bottom. Now that everyone is optimistic, the stock market is topping out and the public (the amateurs) are about to receive their second round of pain."
What to do?
Last time the world's financial markets panicked, something strange happened: the US dollar and US bonds rallied while stocks, commodities, and emerging markets sold off. The same thing could be happening now. It's not so much a flight to quality as it is a flight to liquidity and a massive case of global risk aversion. During the dollar's big rally late 2008 and early 2009, stocks and commodities fell. Yet once low interest rates and government stimuli found their way into stock markets, leveraged traders again bet on equities and higher-yielding risk assets around the global. The dollar fell and the stock market rally got pretty carried away with itself.
This time around, we wouldn't expect the dollar rally to go as high or last as long. We don't think the monetary authorities would be inclined to let a deleveraging positive feedback loop set in again. That is, the powers that be don't want to see falling asset values trigger forced liquidations by leveraged players, leading to more asset sales and further liquidations in property, commodities, and equities.
Now just because Ben Bernanke and the global cabal of counterfeiters don't want something to happen doesn't mean it won't happen anyway. The deflating of the world's asset bubbles is going to happen sooner or later. The world's massive inverse pyramid of debt is supported by a very small asset base. When the underlying assets (often commercial and residential real estate) fall, the whole structure becomes unstable (this is what happened in 2008).
That means that this time around, you wouldn't expect the monetary authorities to let liquidity to dry up again. A ten percent fall in stock prices is just the thing to get policy makers in an accommodative mood again. The US employment figures still stink. And markets are increasingly confused and worried about whether certain sovereign nation states (like Greece and Portugal) can finance their deficits and/or reduce public spending without increasing civil unrest.
Mind you, we don't think more money, credit, or liquidity is the answer. It is, in fact, the problem. The modern world economy is built on a foundation of unsound money.
When central bankers change the cost of capital willy nilly, they corrupt all sorts of incentives in the real economy. And they alter the economics of tens of thousands of investment decisions. If they make money too cheap (always the preference of governments), they create asset bubbles (in stocks, real estate, and commodities).
In fact there's a pretty persuasive argument that the commodity super cycle is itself a symptom of the de-facto dollar devaluation engineered by Richard Nixon in 1971. Once the world moved to free floating exchange rates and fiat currencies not backed by any metal, a tsunami of paper, credit, and debt has lifted (inflated) prices for everything (houses, stocks, commodities, and bonds).
Some people call this wealth.
But if the super cycle of paper money is ending (a big claim for sure), wouldn't it mean a dramatic contraction in global economic activity? Not just a severe recession like in 2008 but really, a long depression in which debts are worked off and paid down, or in which debtors simply default and their creditors must take capital-destroying losses?
Well, yes. All that would happen if the super cycle in paper money is ending. We've argued that it IS ending and that one symptom is a series of escalating sovereign debt crises. The funding model for the welfare state is broken because it's base on unsound money.
But paper money has always been a con game based on belief. Neither the emperors of Rome, the Kings of France and England, or the chairmen of the Federal Reserve have been able to resist debasing the currency. It makes both warfare and welfare possible. Guns and butter are the health of the state and the death of sound money.
The counterfeiters always get first use of the bogus money before its purchasing power is diminished by the increased supply. This is a pretty dodgy way to run a world economy. But the assumption - encouraged by the powers that be - is that the an economy can be controlled with the right tweaks to the right dials by the right people wearing the right suits in the right government offices with the right university degrees.
This is also absurd.
But enough of the theory. What now? If the correction becomes a rout, expect more quantitative easing or policy measures designed to mask the pain (more stimuli). In other words, expect measures that will rekindle inflationary forces. Gold is correcting at the moment. But the risk of inflation remains as real and as potent as ever. So we'd say this is a chance to "buy the dip" on gold and other precious metals.
Regards,
Dan Denning for The Daily Reckoning
---------------------------------------------------------------
And now to Bill who has today's reckoning from TK...
Trichet to Greece: Drop Dead!
Obama to California: Uh...
Yesterday, stocks lost 103 points on the Dow. This looked like a confirmation to us. The stock market appears to have begun its next and final phase...
AP seemed to think so too:
"Stock investors see threats from all directions," said the headline.
We didn't bother to read the article. We already know the directions.
From the north, investors worry about falling consumer demand. Consumers are in a funk - they have more debt, less income, fewer jobs, and less access to credit. The only news on that front we have today is that even jumbo housing loans are going bad...delinquencies are up to 9.6%.
From the east, investors worry about the continued invasion of cheap consumer goods and cheap services. China's economy is said to be growing at double-digit rates. How can US firms compete? And what if China is a bubble, as Jim Chanos believes? When it blows up, US stocks will come down too.
From the south comes the threat of higher interest rates. The poor dopes think the recovery might be for real. If so, inflation will rise and the feds will increase interest rates...possibly cutting off the new boom.
And from the west what do they have to fear? Well, there's that business in Europe. You know, Greece and all. The PIIGS - Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain... Europe's peripheral countries are in trouble. Lenders fret that they might be forced to default on their debt. So, they want higher interest rates. This, of course, just makes state finances worse...pushing the PIIGS closer to default.
The PIIGS owe $2 trillion, which might need to be restructured. Yes, dear reader, the sovereign debt problem is a big one - much bigger than Bear Stearns, Lehman Bros. and AIG. But the biggest porker of all - the USA - has fives times as much sovereign debt as all the PIIGS put together.
It won't take investors long to figure out that there isn't a whole lot of difference between Greece's finances and those of the US. Each has about the same amount of debt and the same size deficit, relative to GDP. The big difference is that the US ultimately controls the currency in which its debt is calibrated. Greece does not. Neither does California.
Both California and Greece borrow long-term at about the same rate...around 6%. Lenders know that when their backs are to the wall, both governments will have only two choices, not three. They can cut spending. Or, they can default. What they can't do is wiggle out of their obligations by inflating their currencies.
Jean Claude Trichet has already made that clear:
"...belonging to the euro area, you...have an easy means of financing your current account deficit. You share a currency that is credible, so that you have a quality of financing that corresponds to that of a credible currency."
He went on to say that Greece contributes only about 3% to the total output of the euro-zone. If push comes to shove, Greece will be pushed out rather than allowed to weaken the euro.
Then, Mr. Trichet made an odious comparison. California is a much bigger part of the US economy than Greece is of the euro economy. In fact, it is more than four times as large. Will the US come to California's aid? Mr. Trichet didn't say.
It is possible, of course, that Mr. Obama will say to the Golden State what Gerald Ford said to the Big Apple. In 1975, New York City's back was to the wall. It appealed to Washington for help. "Ford to City: Drop Dead," was the famous headline in the New York Daily News, reporting the president's response.
New Yorkers were incensed. Later, they realized that by vowing to veto a bailout President Ford had done them a great favor; he forced New York to clean up its act. The city went on to its greatest years. Likewise, the feds would be doing all of us a favor by letting failure fail with dignity.
Will Obama help California mend its ways? Or will he turn it into a zombie state?
--- Dan Amoss's Strategic Short Report Presents... ---
How to Lose Friends and Alienate People
In his latest report, controversial market analyst Dan Amoss shows how to protect your wealth and profit by doing the OPPOSITE of everyone else. To top it all off, the strategy he recommends you use is highly frowned upon!
This won't win you any friends, but who cares when you're taking gains of 161%, 220% and 461%...
WARNING: By following this link, you may feel compelled to think for yourself.
Click here now for details.
---------------------------------------------------------------
And more thoughts...
Snowmageddon has paralyzed the nation's capitol. Once again, the feds announced that only 'emergency workers' had to report to work. And once again, we wondered about all the rest. As near as we could tell, the pumps still worked when we went to fill up our pick-up truck. The coffee tasted the same. Plumbers still plumbed. Bakers still baked. Economists still pretended to know what they were talking about.
All the things that mattered continued...without the intrusion of federal employees.
And here comes more snow! No kidding. Now we have a storm warning for this afternoon. Ten to twenty inches of new snow are forecast.
The highway crews are beaten. They've been piling up snow since Friday. Many have worked around the clock. This new weather forecast must be depressing to them. They must feel like Custer's troops when scouts reported that more Sioux warriors had arrived.
We spent the weekend digging out our driveway. We had only begun when a young man with a heavy Spanish accent came up to us.
"You want some help?"
"How much would you charge?"
"One hundred dollars."
"Hmmm....well, thanks...but I'll do it myself."
Actually, we didn't do it ourselves. Daughter Sophia and son Edward lent a hand. Between the three of us, we did the work in about 3 hours. It was fun. Besides, what else did we have to do? We were snowed in.
As we were working, we noticed other Latin Americans walking up and down the street with snow shovels on their shoulders. After 3 hours, your editor felt his muscles ache. These guys must have done it all day long...Saturday and Sunday.
In this area, the Latinos seem to do all the housework, the roadwork, gardening, landscaping and much of the construction. They truck, they bus, they tote and lift. They're everywhere. They don't seem to mind hard work. And they are enterprising - like real Americans! This weekend, they hustled. And each one of them probably made $500 to $1,000. In cash.
By 6PM yesterday, Baltimore had an eerie feeling to it. The sky was clear. The park in front of our office was covered with snow. No car moved. No human being either.
What had happened? There was something unearthly about it... So quiet. So dead. Had zombies taken over?
Life imitates art. There are so many movies about zombies. Maybe now, zombies really are taking over. They don't foam at the mouth. They don't eat human flesh in public. But many of our fellow Americans are exhibiting some very strange behavior.
Mr. Timothy Geithner, for example. We're not saying he's a zombie. We're not accusing him. We just don't know. All we know is that he's saying remarkable things. For example, he told the nation that the US bond rating was safe. The Wall Street Journal went on to report that he said we would 'never' lose it.
Huh? Of course, US bonds will lose their triple-A rating. The only serious question is when.
Zombies will say the damndest things, won't they?
Regards,
Bill Bonner, for The Daily Reckoning
---------------------------------------------------------------
Here at The Daily Reckoning, we value your questions and comments. If you would like to send us a few thoughts of your own, please address them to your managing editor at joel@dailyreckoning.com
| | The Daily Reckoning - Special Reports: | Gold: The Truth About Gold Fiat Currency: Using the Past to See into the Future "THE GREAT AMERICAN RECOVERY RP-OFF" Brace yourself for what's about to go down as the BIGGEST FINANCIAL SWINDLE in world history. | |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.