The "Impossible" Healthcare Solution: Go Back to Cash
Gary’s Note: Healthcare will be the death of our Republic…whether through the nanny state assuming control of all our information and even more control of our bodies, or whether the attempt to “cover” every soul simply bankrupts us. Charles Hugh Smith has a solution. It’s the only thing that will work, but it’s the one thing that the nanny statists don’t want to hear. Read on.
Whiskey & Gunpowder By Charles Hugh Smith August 5, 2009 OfTwoMinds.com
The “Impossible” Healthcare Solution: Go Back to Cash
The expansion of health insurance and government entitlements created “free money” and thus the explosion of healthcare costs. The solution is simple and “impossible”: we all pay cash.
Here’s why healthcare (a.k.a. sick-care) costs cannot be reduced; the entire system is based on vast pools of “free money.” The corporate-America or union/government employee who goes to the doctor pays a few dollars for a visit and drugs; the “real cost” is of no concern. Ditto the “real costs” charged to Medicare and Medicaid.
“Millionaire Factory” Access Expires at Midnight Tonight
Our exclusive, updated version of this proven strategy has returned gains of 200%, 100%, 107% and 143%...and that’s just in the three weeks since we prepared this report...
The link between the “consumer” of healthcare and the provider has been broken for decades. There is no “free market” in healthcare — there isn’t any market at all. We live in a Kafka-esque nightmare system in which “some are more equal than others” and hundreds of thousands of dollars are lavished on worthless tests, procedures and medications for two reasons:
1. Because there’s “free money” to pay the bills
2. So-called “defensive medicine” in which worthless tests are administered to stave off random (sometimes valid, sometimes nuisance) malpractice lawsuits.
There is a solution so simple and so radical that it is “impossible” (and of course you’re reading it here): shut down insurance and all government entitlements, and return to the “golden era” of the 1950s when everyone paid cash for healthcare. Here are the costs of childbirth as of 1952 at one of the finest hospitals on the West Coast, The Santa Monica Hospital:
And here are the obstetrical rates:
Having a baby cost $30, which is today’s dollars is $244. A private deluxe room cost $23 or $187 in today’s dollars. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistic’s inflation calculator, $1 in 1952 is $8.14 in 2009 dollars.
What does it cost to have a baby now? $10,000? Or is it $25,000? Who even knows?
I know all the reasons why “costs had to skyrocket”: we’re getting so much better care now, right? Actually, as measured by death rates and any other metric you want to select, there is simply no way to justify a 40-fold increase (or is it 100-fold?) in medical care costs. The returns on all the “miracles of modern medicine” are in fact exceedingly marginal — but nobody wants to talk about that.
In 1952, if something awful happened and a patient died, here was the response: “We’re very sorry.” Families weren’t outraged; they expected people to die and interventions were not expected to be miraculous every single time. Doctor Kildaire and all his imitators on TV had not brainwashed the public into reckoning that if someone died, a mistake had been made. They also hadn’t been brainwashed by the mental disorder known as “the American Legal System” into thinking that in every possible circumstance in life, there is liability, and the only question is where to pin it for the big bucks jackpot.
Stories about people suing doctors and hospitals for 5 times the value of a house ($1 million in today’s money would have been $120,000 in 1952, when you could buy a nice house for $20,000) simply did not exist in the 1950s. The cultural mindset that someone somewhere must be at fault and it’s a “right” to go after them did not exist. Since insurance was limited, there was no “free money jackpot” to go after, either.
Gain exposure to currencies of emerging BRIC countries-and don’t lose a dime on market risk.
Don’t let market risk get in the way of potentially rewarding exposure to the BRIC currencies. Our 3-year MarketSafe® BRIC CD shields you from any market risk and provides 100% principal protection on deposits held until maturity.
4 BRIC currencies: Brazilian real, Russian ruble, Indian rupee, Chinese renminbi
High upside potential
No market risk to deposited principal
Low $1,500 minimum deposit
Some experts believe these 4 countries may become economic powerhouses in coming years. Now could be the right time to add these currencies to your portfolio. And you can do so — safely — with the U.S. denominated MarketSafe BRIC CD.
I know you’re probably outraged at the suggestion that “modern safety nets” of insurance and entitlements are the cause of our ills, but follow this idea through:
With no insurance or government program to bill vast sums, then every clinic, doctor and hospital in the U.S. would instantly go broke. Someone would pick up the pieces for $1 or whatever the auction price happened to be and start charging people $50 for a visit to the doctor — not a “co-pay” which was accompanied by a bill for $500 or $1,500 or $15,000 to an insurance company or the government, but $50 cash — that would be the total cost. People might decide they did not need to see the doctor every time they got the sniffles. They might ask the doctor if an MRI was really going to help diagnose their problem or if it was gilding the lily.
As for malpractice, maybe the clinics/hospitals would be non-profits. Go ahead and sue the bejabbers out of them — they have no insurance and no cash. Go ahead and win a huge settlement: you’ll never collect because there’s simply no money. The non-profit folds and another one buys the clinic for $1. With no giant pot of “free money” to pillage, the pillaging goes away. Hospitals which sought stupendous profits would presumably charge more, and hence would have fewer customers. It would be up to the consumer.
The solution to malpractice is information, not lawsuits. Based on my conversations with the M.D.’s who frequent this site, here are some simple policy/regulatory steps which would have very low end costs:
1. License all M.D.’s nationally so they don’t need to go through the absurd waste of time and money being licensed in multiple states.
2. Make all information on clinics, hositals, surgeries, etc. public on the Web. Those doctors willing to take on the very ill will have more patients die than those who avoid the risky cases; it will be up to consumers to sort out the track record of the people who they choose to hire to attend to their health.
Something magical would happen to prices: they would drop to what people could afford to pay cash. Yes, those wonderful folks in the pharmaceutical industry could list their drugs for $10,000 a dose, but few would be buyers. Just as in other countries with no “free money” to tap, the price of that drug would quickly drop to $50. That, or the pharmaceutical companies can go bankrupt and let others fill the vacuum.
What would happen is simple: marginal care would vanish because few would be willing to pay for it. The cost of an MRI in China is a tiny percentage of the cost of an MRI in the U.S., and the machine and training of the technicians is the same; so why does it cost 25 times more for an MRI here? Because there’s a pot of “free money” available to tap.
If the entire system collapsed and everyone paid cash, the cost of an MRI would be $100 or so, regardless of any other conditions. Or, the owners of the MRI machines could declare bankruptcy, sell the machines at auction and let someone else provide the service to those who decided it was worth the expense.
But what about the “poor people” who can’t afford medical care now? Well right now they have to stand in line at emergency rooms — the most wasteful, inefficient system possible. Even “poor people” can afford a few dollars — there’s endless excuses provided yet how many “poor people” have cell phones, eat costly fast food, do costly illegal drugs, etc. etc. Everybody has choices; we’re not all deranged, and for those who are deranged, then clearly the government will have a role in their care when it exceeds the capacity of their family or if they have no family.
Everybody’s got an excuse in our current system, and perhaps that’s why it is morally and financially bankrupt. The U.S. (and certainly not Santa Monica) was not a Third World nation in 1952; people did not feel their healthcare was deficient or poor. There was simply no money to pursue marginal returns except perhaps for a few millionaires seeking exotic treatments. Fine, it’s their money; most died right along with the rest of us and at about the same lifespan.
As for “overall health” of the populace: what with the “diabesity” epidemic out of control due entirely to lifestyle changes, it’s hard to say we’ve gotten 50 times healthier as a result of our healthcare costs rising 50-fold.
Join the “Millionaire’s Market” That Has Banked Average Gains of 91%
After 18 years in the trenches, one of my colleagues has stumbled across a way to legally “hack” this market for some serious gains — like the 107% play he closed out on Thursday, or the 143% gain he locked in on Friday after just one month.
Now, he’s willing to let a select few into his exclusive advisory at a 67% discount! — but only until tonight at midnight. If you want to get in on his 91% average gains this year, click here immediately…
When it comes right down to it, the current system is based on this premise: the average American is too dumb to figure out healthcare for themselves and so we need a gigantic structure of “experts” to figure out what should be done and what it should cost. It’s not even really “insurance” because everyone gets old, ill and then dies.
This has resulted in the most brutally inefficient and even cruel system possible, one in which the very elderly are milked for hundreds of thousands of dollars of “healthcare” in the last days or weeks of their lives while tens of millions get no care at all except at the emergency room. Since no one takes responsibility for their own health or healthcare costs, then people take poor care of themselves and thus many of our ills are self-inflicted. People save little to nothing for emergencies because they’ve learned to expect someone, somewhere, to pay for their healthcare. (It’s a “right.” Really? At whose expense? The Chinese who buy our debt?)
I know, I know — going to a market/cash system is “impossible.” But the irony is that’s where we’ll be in a few years, regardless of what anyone thinks or wants: “healthcare” in its present incarnation will bankrupt the nation just as surely as the sun rises.
Regards, Charles Hugh Smith
If you said, “Hey, it’s that article Gary linked to yesterday!”, then that means you did the required reading. You get a star!
Sorry for the redundancy, but I vowed that if Charles Hugh Smith got back to me with permission, I’d run his article come hell or high water. I loved it that much! We in the Whiskey Room hope he’ll be back again and soon.
Like all other Ponzi schemes, the current health care pileup will eventually collapse. In the meantime, you might want to use the WhiskeyTrade of the Decade to your advantage; seek care in some other countries where competent doctors take cash. Maybe take a “medical tour.”
It also turns out that Mr. Smith and I have a mutual friend in James Howard Kunstler. And speaking of Jim, here are a couple of nice comments some of you Shooters had for him…
Kunstler is one of the very few realists out there! Larry Kudlow and his ilk are either oblivious to reality, or want to delude the masses...I think both. Anyway, just want you to know that I am a BIG FAN of Kunstler and feel he is a lot closer to the FUTURE then many in the financial and political arena today.
Thanks. Good to know!
Bravo! James Howard Kunstler strikes again! I wonder if when the final collapse happens, knowing that it was destined to happen will save any of our lives when the armies of the New Dispossessed come forth to loot and plunder. JHK is so provocative - and I believe, so right. In some way, I liken him to Winston Churchill, who spent most of the 1930's warning the West about the threat posed by Hitler; policy makers of that era dismissed him as a crank, just as many folks I've spoken to dismiss JHK's warnings as so much nonsense.
I however have one small point of contention with Mr. Kunstler…I wonder if perhaps the fact that JHK voted for this charlatan still blinds him to the fact that if anything, Barack Obama is more beholden to Wall Street than any president before him.
But wow…Kunstler as the next Churchill. You heard it hear first, Shooters.
Several Shooters took issue with the neo-liberal writer’s assumptions about the quality of care soldiers get. Here’s just one response:
"Also, the folks in the military have pretty darn good insurance, and guess what, it’s a government-run plan."
This reader needs to talk to people in the military.
I have a military dependant daughter and grandchildren. Their health care is awful. I could go into lengthy details of poor care, uncaring doctors, ridiculous physicals exam protocols, being required to drive an hour past numerous doctors to go to your assigned doctor, unpaid claims, lengthy waiting periods, and being lost from the system…
And tomorrow I will share a truly disturbing letter a serviceman about the results of military quality care.
But now, about my baby-mama drama…
I feel your pain, all of the potential baby-mama’s I find are severely lacking as well. It has to do with training. You need to find some Jewish men to hang out with and discuss the JAP (Jewish American Princess) problem that they are cursed with. Me I am looking to marry a foreigner. Non-USA person, I might even use that to gain admittance to another countries membership called citizenship. Panama sounded good, or maybe I should learn Italian and look at moving to the boot. Russian not all bad either, give me an honest socialist government over a lying one any day.
The best, most rewarding relationships I’ve ever had have been with women from the Iberian Peninsula, but all of them were too smart to marry me.
You know, it’s a common mistake made by men who tire of U.S. women; they marry foreign women, and then bring them to the U.S. to live! That’s like moving to Montana and home-schooling your children, but then giving them sugar and forcing them to watch reality television. You defeat the entire purpose of the original effort.
If you’re smart enough to marry off continent, then be smart enough to move off continent. It’s all part of the WhiskeyTrade of the Decade…but more on that later…
Hi Gary - So you notice it too. I ascribe it to the long-term effects of public "education" (really indoctrination), etc. It's as if the boob tube commercials for "Hulu" are really true and all their brains have been turned to mush. Sad - but at least we have a decent fallback position in Craiglist's "Adult Services". Keep up the good work.
I’m maintaining a tight and careful silence on this. I’ll just let the next letter light the firecrackers before I change the subject…
I attended a seminar last summer where one of the principle speakers was John Lott, economist, statistician, and author of "More Guns, Less Crime", among others. His main premise for the ever expanding, overreaching, all intrusive nanny-state began when women got the right to vote. They were able to begin to lobby the politicians to provide government assistance to rid themselves of the need to have a man to take care of them. To see the end result all you have to do is look at the absolute insanity that is Nancy Pelosi.
This should set off a firestorm on W&G.
Giving women the vote equals accelerating the growth of the nanny state. So maybe the Framers really did think things through when they left the wimmen-folk out of the official political process…?
There. Let the festivities commence.
Hey! Did you know that two modern classics have been updated?
Whiskey & Gunpowder, a free e-letter, is the independent investor's daily guide to gold, commodities, profits and freedom. We sent this e-mail to BRAD0222002.ECONOMY@blogger.com because you or someone using your e-mail address subscribed to this service.
To end your Whiskey & Gunpowder e-mail subscription, click: Unsubscribe.
Nothing in this e-mail should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.